Diversity, Migration and the City
European cities today are more diverse than ever before. New migration and mobility processes, increasing socio-economic inequalities, spatial segregation, and a growing diversity of identities and lifestyles are among the contributing factors. Urban and regional policymakers, local institutions, but also civil society initiatives and organizations face numerous and often complex challenges to meet the needs of Europe’s increasingly diverse population.
Simultaneously ‘diversity’ has become one of the main guiding principles and policy ideals for local politics and planning over the last years. And as such, “it constitutes an antithesis to previous orientations …, in which segregation of homogeneous districts was the governing orthodoxy” (Susan Fainstein, 2005). However, it remains unclear, whether diversity refers to distinct spatial units or structures and what is commonly understood as diversity: Does diversity describe a distinct ethnic or social structure? Or, when we talk about diversity, do we mean a concrete spatial use, offer, mix, or certain kind of qualities, or is it a built structure itself? ‘Diversity’ is often also used as a new euphemism for social mixing policies and the promotion of specific demographics, and thus became a driver for gentrification processes in many cities.
Hence, this class provides an introduction to the study of contemporary urban (and partly regional) diversities for Area Studies. We start with an exploration of the conceptual framework as well as of its theoretical, practical, reception, and application contexts. Since diversity has very different meanings in the social and spatial science literature, we thereby make use of spatial and area studies’ interdisciplinary nature and draw on findings and arguments from sociological, cultural studies, geographical, and planning literature. In detail, we will discuss how European cities benefit from diversity/increased diversities and how they address (the different) diversity/-ies in their local policies and place making strategies, eg. how they frame refugee migration and what services and support they provide to newcomers. In the (post-)migration society, what are old and new practices and infrastructures that enable and support the settlement and integration process of all kinds of newcomers? How are new diversities negotiated on the ground, also between different social groups? What are the new spatial patterns of these diversities (eg. queering the city approaches or solidary city/sanctuary city movements and strategies)?
We will work with the central hypothesis that diversity is an asset, particularly in the 21st century as the century where migration and new mobilities are the norm. Hence, we will also look at how diversity affects social cohesion, social mobility, and economic performance, but also old and new lines of solidarity in the respective regions. In addition, the seminar participants will look at the historical, social, political, and economic forces that shape everyday life in so-called diverse places. This is complemented by critical explorations on the different forms and (contested) notions of ‘identity’, ‘community’ and ‘belonging’, also by means of own empirical socio-spatial observations: Students will work on selected case cities in groups, empirically exploring the political, social, cultural and economic dimension of local diversities, their actors, spaces (as partly also spatial infrastructures) and practices.